Anyone from cisco care to comment on the LDPv6 road map?
-----Original Message----- From: Tim Durack [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:31 PM To: Christian MacNevin Cc: Chris Nicholls; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Christian MacNevin <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh really? So there's still no native ipv6 MPLS? > > OK, well thanks to finding out about the new CLI and this doc, which seems to > be making out that everything should work just fine: > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_vpn_ipv4_ipv6.html > > I now at least have routes propagating across the core via BGP, and they have > valid-looking BGP labels. But I can't ping between the damn things. This my > missing LDP? And why does that doc look like it should all work just fine? > I ran into this about a year ago. Cisco docs say things like: "Restrictions for Implementing IPv6 VPN over MPLS 6VPE supports an MPLS IPv4-signaled core. An MPLS IPv6-signaled core is not supported." I found VPNv6 has to be enabled on IPv4 peers, not IPv6. There is no IPv6 signalled label path, due to their being no implemented LDPv6. -- Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
