Standard schmandard. What's needed is a business case. I've got a fiver. Who wants it? TDPv2 anyone?
-----Original Message----- From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 1:47 PM To: Christian MacNevin Cc: Tim Durack; Chris Nicholls; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6PE: was: mpls over native ipv6? On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Christian MacNevin wrote: > Anyone from cisco care to comment on the LDPv6 road map? Last I checked (couple of months ago) there wasn't even a standard for it, I expressed my opinion in the IETF WG IPv6 control plane for MPLS needs feature parity with IPv4, and LDPv6 is definitely one of the things needed first. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
