>From my understanding the initial FP is proprietary and uses 802.1ah >(mac-in-mac) encapsulation which is very different from TRILL which has its >own header format which is not MAC address based (canonical nicknames >instead.) Cisco has said they will support standard TRILL at a later date.
Phil On Jul 19, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Maxwell Reid wrote: > Fabric Path is based on an proposed IETF standard known as TRILL. > > ~Max > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM, bas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Manu Chao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> DRILL... >>> >>> *Will Fabric Path* be based on OTV? >> >> Have you read Cisco's pages on FP? >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
