i'm guessing whoever upgraded the NX-OS on these did so using scp/ftp/tftp and 
thus needed to assign an ip-address to do so.

you could verify either way by looking at the output from "show accounting log" 
which saves all config commands and is persistent across power-loss and based 
on the date/time recorded there or order-of-events will likely give you an 
indication of whether it was your guys or the partner.

the only reason i replied is that i've never heard of us ever doing such a 
thing, because it would be an incredibly dumb thing to do.  setting a default 
ip-address might work for a home gateway router / switch, but for something in 
the data center - no. :)


cheers,

lincoln.


On 20/07/2010, at 1:19 PM, Church, Charles wrote:

> Lincoln,
> 
>       I did leave out one detail.  These were originally 4.1(3)N2(1), but our 
> installation guys did bump them up to  4.2 individually prior to installing 
> them.  They tell me they used that pre-configured address, not knowing any 
> better.  But the attached file is a 5020 I took out of a box personally, and 
> fired up.  I guess it's possible our reseller put that on there.  I've seen 
> that same IP address on three other 5020s, and a half dozen 5010s, all bought 
> about the same time from the same reseller.  I'll bounce it off them, sorry 
> about the finger pointing.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lincoln Dale [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 11:06 PM
> To: Church, Charles
> Cc: Manu Chao; Peter Rathlev; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NX-OS - Fabric Path
> 
> 
> there is no "default configuration" or pre-coded 10.1.1.50 ip-address on 
> mgmt0.
> first time you boot a switch it starts the setup dialog with a serial console 
> port.
> 
> <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/fundamentals/421_n1_1/Cisco_Nexus_5000_Series_NX-OS_Fundamentals_Configuration_Guide_Release_4_2_1_N1_1_chapter3.html#con_1073243>
> 
> if you had a switch with a configuration then either they were shipped from 
> manufacturing incorrectly (i guess its a possibility), or your installation 
> guys thought it was a good idea to configure it that way.
> 
> as i can find no examples of the former listed in bug searches internal to 
> cisco, i'd say it points at the latter.
> 
> 
> 
> cheers,
> 
> lincoln.
> 
> 
> On 20/07/2010, at 12:36 PM, Church, Charles wrote:
> 
>> Just be careful about connecting the mgmt0 interfaces to anything prior to
>> configuring them.  The default IP address of 10.1.1.50 on them (at least on
>> the 4.2 5000s) will cause a spectacular ARP storm when they conflict with
>> each other, like when you attach several unconfigured ones to the same
>> network.  Several thousand PPS, eventual reloads, etc.  Our installation
>> guys got ahead of the config guys in our new DC, nice little mess it made.
>> Not sure why they put a default address on them, hope it's something they
>> correct in the future. 
>> 
>> Chuck 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Manu Chao
>> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 7:17 PM
>> To: Peter Rathlev
>> Cc: Lincoln Dale; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NX-OS - Fabric Path
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, but Nexus hardware is the right platform if you don't want to loose any
>> packet in your DC ;)
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Peter Rathlev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 08:29 +1000, Lincoln Dale wrote:
>>>> right now the hardware is using a frame format that is not that of
>>>> what TRILL uses (and as such we're using a Cisco-defined ethertype),
>>>> however the hardware is capable of supporting standards-based TRILL as
>>>> and when the standard is finalised & ratified.
>>> 
>>> Would that hardware happen be the EARL8? And would there be any chance
>>> that us "old skool" Cat6500 guys get to share to thrill of TRILL (or
>>> similar)? :-)
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Peter
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> <5020 boot.TXT>


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to