On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone met any issues with .0 and .255 as host addresses? >
I've tried it before and found that apart from some broken implementations, the biggest issue seemed to be certain Internet banking sites that seemed to view traffic from addresses ending in .0 or .255 as invalid. Discussions with the banks in questions were not that fruitful, so we just treat each assignment as a /24 and leave out the .0 and .255 addresses. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
