I'm inclined to agree. VRF's are much easier to troubleshoot than PBR when you have problems, as they use standard destination-based routing. When you use PBR, looking at the routing table is virtually meaningless.
GG On 7/28/10, Jan Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> The 2811 has two connections coming in on ATM0/2/0 (binding to Di1) and >> ATM0/3/0 (binding to Di0). I've got a small gaggle of VLANs. I'm trying >> to get VLAN10 sending/receiving everything over Di1 and everything else >> over Di0. > > just as a personal preference I would suggest using vrf-lite instead of > pbr in your case. > Other guys saying about tcp in pbr are of course right. > > Beste ragards, > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
