> Was hoping someone could advise with regards to what the NAT keywords
> "match-in-vrf" achieves? We typically use this in production. However,
Ive
> just
> been labbing NAT config using VRF lite and it doesnt appear to change
> behaviour
> and Cisco literature is unclear. With or without it, translations
occur in
> the
> relevant VRF.
not an expert, but do you use overlapping pools between vrfs? If you are
not, you don't need "match-in-vrf".. take a look at
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Category:NAT
oli
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
