Absolutely correct. We are by no means "backing away from", "sunsetting", "scaling back development" or anything else to that effect, the 6500 platform.
-Ben On Aug 27, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > On 2010-08-27 20:20, Tim Durack wrote: > >> Despite claims to the opposite, I don't think Cisco are committing >> much engineering resources to the C6K at this point in its life. > > On the contrary. You'll see a lot of new things soon and the 6500 > stays a flagship for Enterprise deployments and services for the DC. > > Competitors are just trying to make you belive *their* worst nightmare > is going away. > > -- > "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski > If it's not okay, it's not the end." | http://lukasz.bromirski.net > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
