Hi, On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:23:39PM +0100, Heath Jones wrote: > > Sure it will. But it's not permitted to use that as a source address > > for anything that's not link-local. > > Ok, cool. > > I've done some reading and this is my take on it.. > Is it that link-local addresses are used for ND & some routing > protocols use ND mechanisms to check adjacencies? Apart from that, > there doesnt appear to be a (real) requirement for them in a > router-router p2p enviroment..?
OSPFv3 (and, I'd assume, EIGRP for IPv6) communicate via link-local
addresses. So if you don't have them, these IGPs will fail...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpCHXLwtiO0Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
