I have been working through a timeless topic: p2p transit link addressing. After reading http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?rfc=3627 and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-04 as well a networkers presentation, various blogs, etc. I thought it was time to consult people who might actually be dealing with this in production today in hopes that I can learn from any potential mistakes.
Can I simply avoid the problem of p2p links altogether with unnumbered from an ipv6 loopback address? I fear that link local addressing will ruin traceroute information. Any definitive answers would be greatly appreciated. I would prefer not to burn up all of my routable address space with p2p /64's however. Thanks for your time, John _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
