Ok thank's for you rapid reply, i know what i have to do.
Le 20/10/2010 14:26, Rob Taylor a écrit :
Jean-Dominique,
Using HWIC on an ISR, you can configured xconnect on an SVI (not on
physical port), but that xconnect will not allow BPDUs to pass over
the l2tpv3 tunnel.
This requires latest 12.4T code (tested on 12.4(24)T3).
Its a known limitation on the HWIC, and development does not have
current plans to fix it do to the other implications for the hwic module.
So, use dedicated L3 ports for l2tpv3 if you need bpdus to pass.
Rob
On 10/20/2010 7:06 AM, Jean-Dominique BAYLAC wrote:
Hello all.
I try to realize a setup with 2 cisco 2801 to backup a fiber in case
of outage.
We have 2 pairs of cisco 3750 on each site with one path to fiber,
and one path via pseudowire
On 2801
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
speed 100
full-duplex
no mop enabled
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
xconnect 10.0.0.2 1 encapsulation l2tpv3 pw-class BACKUPLINK
I need to interconnect the 2801's to a third site. This time is a
classic vpn with route.
HQ: 192.168.0/24
REMOTE: 192.168.10.0/24
But with my current setup, 2801's pass the trafic of the 3750's but,
don't care the content of packet.
i need to connect another interface from the 2801 to the 3750,
I want to know if is possible to xconnect a port from HWIC-4ESW, or i
need absolutly HWIC-1FE(L3 port) ?
Thank's for your reply
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
