I'd just be happy if they tested anything beyond the 'it boots', which more and more these days seems like all that's happening...
But it's cheaper to pay TAC people than QA people, especially when you can get your customers to be QA for you! Ken Matlock Network Analyst Exempla Healthcare (303) 467-4671 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Lumbis Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:53 AM To: Randy McAnally Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5 The big thing is just time and resources. How many different code/hardware/firmware permutations can you test? If they want to see if the NPE-300 runs with every firmware on every build since it was released with a full set of regression tests (IPv6, IPv4, BGP, IRB, etc) the time to test becomes infinitely large. At some point the vendor doesn't test and simply ends support. This doesn't mean it won't work, it just means there are no guarantees. -Pete On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Randy McAnally <[email protected]> wrote: >> Curious why cisco recommends to upgrade rommon if it works also >> on older version ?! > > My guess: so they have a simple reason to throw the ball back in your court > when <insert problem here> happens. > > -Randy > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
