So is there any way to increase the buffers without causing more damage? Or is this a hardware limitation?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:28:03PM -0600, Dan Letkeman wrote: >> 3560 or 3560G. > > Lame switches with too-small buffers. > > [..] >> I do have auto qos enabled for some of the phones I have connected to >> the switches, but I don't have any qos on the etherchannel trunks. > > Turning *off* qos will reduce the amount of drops you see (what qos does > is "take tiny buffers, spread over 4 different queues, and all of a > sudden your traffic only has 1/4th the buffer space available"). > > Alternatively, you could fiddle with qos to give all buffers to > a single queue, and put all traffic in that queue, but that's > effectively turning it off... > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] > fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
