vince anton wrote:
it surprises me that some people seem to be ok with passing transit traffic over a peering link. I dont understand why you would want to do this, as to me this seems abuse or misconfiguration (possibly not intentional), and potentially very expensive, or loss of revenue.
The example you gave should not result in "passing transit traffic over a peering link" unless the more specifics are filtered somewhere. The only traffic you should be sending to the more specifics learned from your peer is from your own customers. In that case it is legitimate peering traffic and also the best path based on the information you have available (bgp). You aren't re-advertising the more specifics learned from your peers to non-customers right? - Kevin _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
