On 06/08/2011 11:35 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 08/06/2011 10:15, Phil Mayers wrote:
The first will never read >100mbit/sec. The second will read
correctly, so
if you're doing >100mbit/sec they'll look different.
about 112mbit/sec. So if you see graphs pegged at ~112mbit/sec, you know
you're running into a 32-bit counter limitation.
snmpv1+32 bit counters are pretty useless these days. I wish Cacti would
print up a large warning when people attempted to use these oids because
they cause lots of breakage.
Indeed. Frankly, it's damn annoying Cacti doesn't just "figure it out",
at least for standard counters where the 64-bit alternatives are well
known. But that's really the least of it's warts!
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/