On 17/07/2011 11:10, Gert Doering wrote: > From all I was able to gather, -modular / ION is dead. Lack of > progress, lack of buy-in from other BUs, short-sighted management.
Yeah, -modular left me feeling rather cold. Can't imagine why, but the ability to restart the line printer daemon on my 6500 just didn't do it for me :-) > XE is what the rumors told me the Sup2T would be based upon, but IOS > versions like "12.2(50)SY" very much sound like IOS-trains. Perhaps they are taking the 12.2(33) code train, compiling it up on the XE framework and calling it 12.2(50)SY? This is pure speculation, but there has been so much 6500-centered development over the last number of years that it would be fatal not to base the code on the SX code train. On the other hand, as XE provides a good quality development environment, why not use that as the host operating system? Probably easier than yet another IOS port to another chipset. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
