Hi Scott, We are speaking with the IPv6 address for the peering and a separate IPv4 address for IPv4 peering. We have a route-policy that does a deny local and permit all others for inbound and a route policy that permits our /32 outbound. Just kind of strange that it does not announce to them.
-Lee On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Scott Granados <[email protected]>wrote: > So I could be way way off here so take with many grains of salt. > Can't speak for IPV6 but with V4 they use an A / B peering arrangement > for customer links. Are you sure you're announcing your routes to the > correct peer? If they do IPV6 with a single address then sorry for the > misdirection but with IPV4 they definitely use a pair of sessions. > > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Lee Starnes > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 BGP on IOS-XR > > > Hi all, > > Does anyone have any recommended reading for doing IPv6 BGP peering on > IOS-XR? We setup our peer with Cogent and can get full routes in, but can't > seem to figure out how to announce our /32. I had assumed it setup just the > same way as IPv4, but can't seem to get it to announce out. I did some > searching on Cisco's site, but didn't really find anything that pertained > to > how/what to announce and what not to announce. > > We are running version 4.0.1 > > Thanks, > > Lee > ______________________________**_________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> > archive at > http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
