Hi Andrew,

Tnhan you for you answer. Actually youa re right about the inbound traffic in which I can easily advetise this network with a preference to my "ISPA", this is fine and already done.

The issue here is about the oubound traffic, when my customer traffic is going back out to ISP, I can also you weight on the router where I host this "ISPA" and use no-advertise attribute so I don t advertise prefixes to others iBGP routers, fine but others customer traffic will also be routed via ISPA because the shortest ISP path is going throught this router too...

On the diagram below cust 1, cust2 from RO4 are routed through RO1 and then to ISPA, I just want cust1 to be routed over ISPA and cust2 over ISPb without using IGP metric.

ISPA....RO1----RO2.....ISPX
            I   \     /  |
            I     \  /   |
            I      /\    |
          RO3    RO4
                      | | |
                  cust1 cust2 ...

hopes this diagram helps

regards

Alexandre



On 01/08/11 15:57, Andrii Morozov wrote:
Hello Alexandre,

If my understanding of what you've written is correct, there is no need for implementing a VRF in your case.

As far as I understood, you want the downstream traffic for a specific address block to be routed via particular ISP, right? For this purpose you should create a route object in RIPE database (if it's no created yet) and start to announce this block normally to desirable ISP and at the same time advertise it with AS_PATH prepend = X (for example, X=5) to those ISPs, which you don't want the traffic to pass through. This is achieved via creating an outbound route policy (route-map in case of Cisco) towards your ISPs.

After you accomplish the route policy implementation, you can check the result via looking glass of some other's ISP to see how your block "is seen" frow the world.

Best wishes, Andrew.

2011/8/1 Alexandre Durand <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    Hi,

    I was wondering if any of you had alerady the experience of source
    routing tarffic over multihomed network based?

    We run a network with several ISP and peering that provide
    internet full routing table and we want for specific network bloc
    to be routed through one of our dedicate cheap transit ISP, but
    leave others on the same router to be routed via others ISPs. we
    run full meshed IBGP and multi-home transits or peering.

    I might have found 2 solutions and use PBR or VRF but I don t know
    how to implement them yet. VRF looks nice but I may miss transit
    redundancy. Let s say I create a specific vrf for this ISP, others
    ISPs remain in the global routing table, if this provider is not
    availaible, the traffic is no longer routed out the others ISPs
    and also I can t share and send traffic over peerings...

    Is there any doc or guide for such solution that I can use so I
    can work on the appropriate solution and configuration and adapt
    it to our needs and network specifications?

-- Alexandre DURAND
    TAS FRANCE
    WTC 1-K, 1300 route des CrĂȘtes
    06560 Valbonne Sophia Antipolis
    Phone :    +33 (0)4 92 94 56 93
    Fax   :    +33 (0)4 92 94 33 99
    Web: http://www.tasfrance.com
    Email : [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    peering: http://as8554.peeringdb.com

    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




--
Alexandre DURAND
TAS FRANCE
WTC 1-K, 1300 route des CrĂȘtes
06560 Valbonne Sophia Antipolis
Phone :    +33 (0)4 92 94 56 93
Fax   :    +33 (0)4 92 94 33 99
Web:       http://www.tasfrance.com
Email :    [email protected]
peering:   http://as8554.peeringdb.com

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to