Well I don t agree, It is easy enought on route A to overweight ISPA so path is preffered over ISPA for any source, so I just use PBR to send my customer traffic via ISPA and the other source traffic to the Router B with ISPB. As this is said, I might change my route-map as follow:

ip prefix-list cust1 deny x.x.x.x/24
ip prefix-list cust1 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

route-map cust1, permit, sequence 10
 Match clauses:
   ip address prefix-list cust1
 Set clauses:
   ip next-hop ISPB
 Policy routing matches: 15 packets, 1710 bytes

Any traffic except my customer traffic will be forwarded to ISPB




On 03/08/11 09:54, Andrii Morozov wrote:
According to the scheme drawn above, you have an iBGP between your border routers. Thus, they will send the best routes to each other. This means, no matter whether you set PBR or not, if the best path is selected over ISB B, the traffic will traverse that link, but not ISP A.

2011/8/2 Alexandre Durand <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    weird I used only PBR and it seems to be working. I created a
    route-map that send cust1 traffic out to ISPA (RIB internet
    routes) and any other customer source traffic out to ISPB. the
    weird thing is that ISPB routes are NLRI routes and not RIB routes
    ... how can this be working ...

    regards

    alexandre

    route-map cust1, permit, sequence 10
     Match clauses:
       ip address (access-lists): cust1
     Set clauses:
       ip next-hop ISPA
     Policy routing matches: 122 packets, 13908 bytes
    route-map cust1, permit, sequence 20
     Match clauses:  (ANY)
     Set clauses:
       ip next-hop ISPB
     Policy routing matches: 15 packets, 1710 bytes


    On 02/08/11 11:04, Alexandre Durand wrote:

        Hi,

        You are right, however on router A is connected to ISPA, bgp
        will add only preferred ISPA routes and  not the others routes
        from router B ISPB with IBGP, but only ISPA routes will be
        preferred on this router A (attribute weight), router A will
        be not aware about ISPB rouites unless ISPA goes down.

        I may use a dedicated vrf for ISPA so global routing table and
        vrf table are not bound each other. And then use PBR over
        route-map to redirect first via ISPA VRF and secondly via
        global routing table where ISPB routes will be present in RIB.
        What do you think about it?

        The only issue witch such solution is that I will need to
        upgrade the ios because vrf under route-map is not supported
        on my IOS(12.2(18)SXD3).

        regards

        Alexandre

        On 01/08/11 17:56, David Freedman wrote:

            -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
            Hash: SHA1

            On 01/08/11 15:35, Alexandre Durand wrote:

                Hi Andrew,

                Tnhan you for you answer. Actually youa re right about
                the inbound
                traffic in which I can easily advetise this network
                with a preference to
                my "ISPA", this is fine and already done.

                The issue here is about the oubound traffic, when my
                customer traffic is
                going back out to ISP, I can also you weight on the
                router where I host
                this "ISPA" and use no-advertise attribute so I don t
                advertise
                prefixes to others iBGP routers, fine but others
                customer traffic will
                also be routed via ISPA because the shortest ISP path
                is going throught
                this router too...

            I think what you are saying sounds like this:

            |Your Network---Internet---------|

            [Cust1]--( N )
                     ( E )--[ISPA]-(N)-[Cust4]
            [Cust2]--( T )         (E)
                     ( W )--[ISPB]-(T)-[Cust5]
            [Cust3]--( K )



            I take it you want to do :

            - - Predetermined outbound path Cust1->Cust4 via ISPA
            - - Predetermined outbound path Cust2->Cust5 via ISPB
            - - Cust3 ->  Cust4/5 via any/best path

            What you are talking about is essentially policy routing
            at your edge
            (i.e using your own criteria, like customer ID to
            influence outbound
            routing, not metrics)

            you can do this simply with PBR at the edge but it won't
            be very
            reliable, but you might want to look at OER/PFR

            
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8787/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html)


            Dave.
            -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
            Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
            Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
            http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

            iEYEARECAAYFAk42zL4ACgkQtFWeqpgEZrK2BgCgwGU7nRzRPklKNII9L69uA00I
            w5YAoKkhzi8L8Roo5oONsg/6z1aNW0ka
            =lLQt
            -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
            _______________________________________________
            cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
            archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/





-- Alexandre DURAND
    TAS FRANCE
    WTC 1-K, 1300 route des CrĂȘtes
    06560 Valbonne Sophia Antipolis
    Phone :    +33 (0)4 92 94 56 93
    Fax   :    +33 (0)4 92 94 33 99
    Web: http://www.tasfrance.com
    Email : [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    peering: http://as8554.peeringdb.com

    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




--
Alexandre DURAND
TAS FRANCE
WTC 1-K, 1300 route des CrĂȘtes
06560 Valbonne Sophia Antipolis
Phone :    +33 (0)4 92 94 56 93
Fax   :    +33 (0)4 92 94 33 99
Web:       http://www.tasfrance.com
Email :    [email protected]
peering:   http://as8554.peeringdb.com

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to