Hi Dale, In the right vendor shop no matter how many networkers sessions you attend there should be no need to make any thing "apparent" from the power-point slides.
If CLI/parser allows to co-exist any feature combination - they are expected to work. I am with Matthew here. If they do not work one should not be able to configure them .. get the error/warning or syslog message at min. Talking even to squadron of TMEs will not help here either. Logging a ddts to either fix it or block it is the answer. Cheers, R. > On Aug 26, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: > >> Last winter we purchased a pair of 7606 routers to use out at the NYSE colo >> facility. We connect via a 1gb fiber to the SFTI LCN for market data and FIX >> traffic. We fully expected to be able to use hardware assisted NAT and NDE >> to monitor the traffic. The netflow output we get is random, sporadic and >> very incomplete. After dealing with our Sales team and TAC, we have finally >> got them to admit that it doesn't work when NAT and NDE are configured on >> the same interface. > > I seem to remember that being made apparent when the sup720 was first > announced, and I also think it was presented in the cat6k architecture > session at networkers when I went in 2005. > > Sounds to me that you really need a better sales team that can engage > the right TME. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
