Hi, On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:12:44AM -0500, Tony Varriale wrote: > Then hire someone that knows what they are doing.
Am I the only one to find that sort of remark a bit nasty?
While not sporting any nice certificates, I consider myself to be
somewhat experienced with Cisco platforms, and Cisco architecture - and
if a prospective customer would have asked me "will NAT and netflow
work together?" I would have checked the documentation, would not have
found anything about that conflict either, and would have said "no
problem there".
After all, on other Cisco platforms netflow is used as well to help
NAT (netflow feature-acceleration), and of course, the corresponding
flow records get exported properly afterwards.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgptikfFWBa39.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
