Hi, On Tuesday 13 March 2012 16:01:10 Ruslan Pustovoitov wrote: > > Card is occupied full slot in chassis and costs about 200.000$ in GPL > > with license for 10 miilion sessions. > > I know that other vendors with more ancient NATs has double > > performance for this price. > > > > Also, I look in CGSE blade for CRS-1 and CRS-3 platform. > > Presentation says it has 10 Gbit/s full-duplex performance and card > > occupy one slot. > > Does it meen that CGN in CRS more powerfull that CGN in ASR9k or this > > is the sort of marketing game ?
...the CGSE can hold up to 20 mio concurrent nat sessions and multiple blades can be installed in one CRS-1. I thought the ISE for asr9k is more or less identical to the CGSE (at least it's based on the same code), so it might be a marketing decision to allow only 10mio sessions. regards, Andy _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
