Hi,
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Xu Hu wrote:
Actually in our 3G network, we use the 7609 (two ACE modules) for the NAT,
in the live situation, we had 4M users.
It is quite stable for now.
Also we bought the ASR9K to expand the 3G network, maybe will migrate the
NAT to ASR9K.
I am curios if and if how you are doing logging for law enforment purposes on
that scale ?
We in europe have some pressure to have the ability to map the
ip/port/timestamp touple back to user. Of course nobody will be able to deliver
the port together with the ip and an accurate enough timestamp for this to be
meaningfull.
I can see this becoming a larger problem when more nats appear on conventional
DSL / FTTx / Cable access products as opposed to just low bandwidth mobile
networks.
Greetings
Christian
Xu Hu
2012/3/14 Ruslan Pustovoitov <ru...@mostelekom.net>
The question was what strategy of NAT deployment can be accepted by large
ISP if one of the internal condition to use only cisco boxes for NAT ?
Hidden cost was always visible to engeneers )
Now It is time to pay )
Has cisco plan to announce in next two year sucsessor of ISM-100 with
better performance ?
For example, if ISP already has asr9k chassis placed everywere in it's
network, it will be happy to know that in 2013 cisco planning to do another
card which will seat instead of ISM-100 into the same chassis.
Gert Doering ?????:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:01:10PM +0400, Ruslan Pustovoitov wrote:
Does this question not worry community ?
I think it's great that the hidden costs that come with running IPv4
now start being openly visible...
Sorry, what was the question?
gert
______________________________**_________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
archive at
http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH
Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2
Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden
Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart
Web: http://www.cksoft.de/ Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
