Is there a reason why my pe's only install type 5 routes from the ospf neighboring ce?
In other words, on the pe, I see lots of type-3's in the vrf-specific ospf db learned from the directly connected ce...but in this pe, I only see type 5's installed in vrf rib, and thus, subsequently, only those type-5's are redis'd to remotely located pe's where other member vrf are located. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Pinsky [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:42 PM To: Aaron Cc: 'Tim Durack'; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron wrote: > I didn't have to use import, and they still came into vrf. ? any idea why? > With unique RD, each route advertised by each PE is considered a separate prefix with a different nexthop. So, bestpath is run for each of those unique RD/Prefixes and the bestpath is then imported into the VRF. maximum-paths only comes into play when you have more than one nexthop for each unique RD/prefix (such as when you have redundant RRs). - -- ========= bep -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+QXGEACgkQE1XcgMgrtyZI6ACfdKbMaBfqQ5oNRnXo745qi4KW wFMAn2hYdLo9Kg51vfWtPiXryotiGtgA =/B1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
