On 03/07/12 23:53, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote:
Agree with Tarko on RAD, stay away from them.
I tend to agree. The RAD gear we have is really poor in a lot of important ways; bad software, bad diagnostics, bad logging.
The one thing I *will* say is that, when up and running, it provides fair-to-middling circuit emulation via short-haul Ethernet/IP links, and does it without new-fangled clocking like SyncE/1588 (which we can't support). However, we had to enable QoS to get priority queueing, because it is VERY intolerant of jitter (and loss, of course - I wish it had FEC) due to the buffering strategy it uses.
We still don't have a perfect path, but it's acceptable for our needs (legacy voice links delivered as cheaply as possible). However, I would probably consider other products if I was doing it again.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
