Have you applied the QoS policies needed for FCoE? What do your virtual FC interfaces show? You should see something like vfc# is trunking with a VSAN up and the proper FCoE VLAN listed.
Here's an example of non SAN boot FCoE config: interface Ethernet2/4 description To esx4 CNA port1 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan 100,200,400-430 spanning-tree port type edge trunk channel-group 124 ! interface vfc124 bind interface port-channel124 switchport trunk allowed vsan 100 no shutdown The SAN boot version is the same, except you bind to the Ethernet interface instead. Have you already read this? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps10110/ps11975/guide_c07-686089.html#wp9000363 -ryan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of simon thomason Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 5596 - B22HP FCOE question Hi All, Not certain if anyone can help but I have configured a new set of 5k for LAN fine all up and running but struggling with the SAN config. Current I have storage attacked to the 5k fine but the problem i am having is with the B22HP. I can see the ethernet ports fine and in DCNM see the FCOE ports but they are not talking back to the 5k to attack to the SAN. Can not see Flogi entry for the fcoe ports. I have followed the fcoe config guides closely but it seems like i am missing a step to attach the FCOE ports to the san management? I know there is not a lot of details but anyone run into something like this before? Good with the LAN side not so good with the SAN. Cheers, Simon. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
