May I suggest; when replying to a "digest" You change the *subject-line* appropriately. ./Randy
--- On Thu, 8/30/12, Michael Malitsky <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Michael Malitsky <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 117, Issue 64 > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, August 30, 2012, 4:14 PM > This is a change requiring telco > involvement, which means 30-60 days. > So not feasible at the moment. > > But I think more to the point, I have the same problems on > the T1s that > come in as DS3 channels. And the pa-mc-t3 counters are > almost perfectly > clean. I can post the results if it would be helpful. > > Sincerely, > Michael Malitsky > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 5 > > Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:53:22 -0600 > > From: Tim Densmore <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 Line protocol bouncing > > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > > > On 8/30/2012 11:49 AM, Michael Malitsky wrote: > > > This is a > > > 7206VXR, with a PA-MC-T3 and a PA-MC-4T1 cards. > > Is there a reason you have to run these T1s to the 4T1 > card? The > > pa-mc-t3 gives very good 24 hour PMs (show controllers > t3 n/n/n > > tabular), and the 4T1 does not (as far as I know at > least- show > > service-module isn't an option I see, and show serial > gives nothing > that > > looks useful w/o a decoder ring). If your > circuits are dirty or > taking > > lots of slips, etc, you'd be able to see it easily on > that card. > > > > -TD > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
