Hi list,

In an enterprise network I have a core of 4900Ms with a few ASR1ks hanging off 
to handle upstream connectivity.  As an example:

Upstream1 - [ASR1k]--[4900M]--[4900M]--[ASR1k] - Upstream2
                        |        |
                        |        |
                    Servers    Workstations, etc


The ASRs and 4900Ms are running BGP and ISIS with full tables on the ASRs and 
mostly just defaults on the 4900Ms.  The ASRs are originating defaults via BGP 
but on reload they are blackholing traffic whilst BGP converges.

I've seen that OSPF and ISIS have 'wait-for-bgp' overload bits available and 
have been questioning whether switching to an IGP-generated default with 
wait-for-bpg is the correct solution here.  Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Tom


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to