Thanks for the tips, we'll have a play with some of the options suggested around originating the default.
On 05/10/2012, at 11:52 AM, Anton Kapela wrote: > also +1 to inter-border router ibgp sessions over some other layer2 > path/port pair/etc -- one should always have that, unless you can't > for some strange reason. On 27/09/2012, at 11:24 PM, David Prall wrote: > As well could put a GRE Tunnel or VLAN between the two ASR's and run iBGP > between the two. You control the path between the two routers, so the tunnel > can be over a jumbo frame capable path. I'm glad a iBGP session between the ASRs over a GRE tunnel was mentioned, as that's exactly what we have running and I was questioning whether this was a bad practice or not... Thanks, Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
