Hi Arie, Below is the desired excerpt. We can't see the VRF config being applied to the interfaces but its visible in "show ip int virtual-access". I have tried two different way in RADIUS attributes but the results are the same.
LNS#show ppp all Interface/ID OPEN+ Nego* Fail- Stage Peer Address Peer Name ------------ --------------------- -------- --------------- -------------------- Vi4 LCP+ CHAP+ IPCP+ LocalT 192.168.254.200 \ sp...@cerberusnetworks.co.uk Vi3 LCP+ CHAP+ IPCP+ LocalT 192.168.254.100 \ m...@cerberusnetworks.co.uk LNS#show run int vir LNS#show run int virtual-acc LNS#show run int virtual-access 3 Building configuration... Current configuration : 78 bytes ! interface Virtual-Access3 ip mtu 1492 ip verify unicast reverse-path end LNS#show run int virtual-access 4 Building configuration... Current configuration : 78 bytes ! interface Virtual-Access4 ip mtu 1492 ip verify unicast reverse-path end ================= LNS#show ip int virtual-access 3 Virtual-Access3 is up, line protocol is up Interface is unnumbered. Using address of Loopback2 (2.2.2.1) Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Peer address is 192.168.254.100 MTU is 1492 bytes Helper address is not set Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled Outgoing access list is not set Inbound access list is not set Proxy ARP is enabled Local Proxy ARP is disabled Security level is default Split horizon is enabled ICMP redirects are always sent ICMP unreachables are always sent ICMP mask replies are never sent IP fast switching is enabled IP Flow switching is disabled IP CEF switching is enabled IP CEF switching turbo vector IP CEF turbo switching turbo vector VPN Routing/Forwarding "U" Downstream VPN Routing/Forwarding "D" Associated unicast routing topologies: ipv4 topologies in downstream VRF "D" : Topology "base", operation state is UP ipv4 topologies in upstream(forwarding) VRF "U": Topology "base", operation state is UP =============================================== Thanks Hitesh On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) <avay...@cisco.com>wrote: > Hitesh, how does your virtual-access look like for the spokes?**** > > Can you please share the “show run interface virtual-access xx” for the > spokes?**** > > ** ** > > Tnx**** > > Arie**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Hitesh Vinzoda [mailto:vinzoda.hit...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 09, 2012 09:05 > *To:* Arie Vayner (avayner) > *Cc:* Cisco Mailing list > *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF**** > > ** ** > > Hi Arie,**** > > ** ** > > I have attached topology, .Net file and configs of related devices. R8 and > R9 are simulating spokes whereas Internet-RTR is simulating Hub.**** > > ** ** > > Cheers**** > > ** ** > > Hitesh**** > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) <avay...@cisco.com> > wrote:**** > > Hitesh, can you maybe share some of your configs? > Arie**** > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: > cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hitesh Vinzoda > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 07:04 > To: Cisco Mailing list > Subject: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF > > I am trying to setup half duplex vrf to save vrf's on the LNS. Does anyone > has working configuration for spokes and Hub connected on the same PE > router i.e. LNS. So far i able to export-import the routes but the traces > from one spoke to other goes directly via LNS instead of via Hub. > > Please advise. > > TIA > Hitesh**** > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/**** > > ** ** > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/