Hi all For me I prefer static or BGP , but I like to test every possible solution available
Thanks BR, Mohammad > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:34:00 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Saku Ytti wrote: > > On (2012-10-17 17:11 +0300), Mohammad Khalil wrote: > > > >> I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE > >> deployment but seems IOS does not support that yet > > > > Out of curiosity. Why are people choosing to run IGP in network > > borders? Link-state is complex, expensive and poorly manageable (in > > terms of filters/policies/route-map) > > > > Customers are asking for and willing to pay for it???? > > > - -- > ========= > bep > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlB/sOgACgkQE1XcgMgrtyZC3ACgzW24qhxTXolrM0OAEigekotk > IQgAn0C/OWAdTH8uwXXDNs5NYNkoeEWi > =Br+4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
