Saku Ytti wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cisco-sla-protocol-04
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/app-notes/3500145-en.pdf
I wonder if those implicitly mean that you are allowed to build responder
or not. The Cisco draft is not really what we're seeing in real-life
(real-life identifies itself as version 1, draft is for version 2).
Indeed the packet format is very different...
How does your responder compare to the one I gave link for? Does it support
microsecond precision for UDP jitter?
Tbh I didn't know there was a "precision microsecond" command. From what
I can
see in your co-worker's code, this is handled by a different message
type (with code 0x03)
whereas the probe with millisecond resolution has code 0x02. Adding
support for it
shouldn't be very complicated.
About the packet handling, since I only support TCP/UDP probes, I use
the classic socket
API.
Christophe
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
