Hi, On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:13:02AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote: > But for completely other (numerous) reasons, we're ditching whole L2 and > rocking MPLS end to end.
Yeah. We see to it that our L2 STP domains are very small (if we can
avoid it, no more than 4-6 devices each), and we need to go cross-city,
it's EoMPLS instead of "STP + L2 all across the core".
But our business is very much different from yours - less customers, and
much more customized setups for each customer. We *do* have VLAN assignment
conventions, and all that, of course :-) - but at least once a month we
need to do something that's an exception for some reason - and then I'm
quite happy not having to fiddle with MST vlan mapping.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpZZsOhANJMc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
