Hi, On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:22:27PM -0500, Chuck Church wrote: > Just curious, is the VLAN mapping to instances the big issue you guys have > with MST? In our deployments we used pretty large ranges to cover growth, > and mapped purposes such as L2-only VLANs (no SVI), servers, users, VoIP, > etc into separate instances, worked pretty solidly. Except when Nexus > changes the mappings on you because some are reserved that is...
"This link is full, I want *that* VLAN to go over *there* as preferred
path". Blam, MST topology change, game over.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpwe84Xf3poY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
