On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Randy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 5:57 pm, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > >> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Randy wrote: >> >> User complained his ipv6 gw on his vlan interface was down. On >>> checking, I couldn't ping it either from the local router. >>> >>> This looked interesting to me on a sh ipv6 route for the gw IP (note >>> 'backup from...' line): >>> >> >> What does the interface config look like? >> > > Very basic. > > interface VlanXX > ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x > no ip redirects > no ip unreachables > no ip proxy-arp > ipv6 address x.x.x:6::1/64 > end > > -- > ~Randy > > The interesting thing to me is that in the first case you have a /64 of type connected, but in the second case you have a /128 of type receive. I think the /128 type receive just means that the ip address is on the router itself. So, the question remains why you got different results before and after bouncing the interface. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
