On 12/08/2012 1:14 pm, Tóth András wrote:
The first case shows /64 while the second is /128 as John pointed out
as well. Perhaps the Vlan interface (SVI) was in down state,
therefore
the router did not have the /128 receive entry and the address was
covered by a "backup" /64 static route instead.
I didn't do a sh interface (unfortunately). Nothing logged. However,
there are a couple dozen identical interfaces (different users /
environments) that are fine and this is the first time I've seen this
happen. There are many dozens of VM's on this VLAN that could be doing
'bad things'. Rogue RA? VLAN is fine since the bounce. I'm still at a
loss.
--
~Randy
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
