On 12/12/12, Randy <[email protected]> wrote: > --- On Wed, 12/12/12, Dobbins, Roland <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Dobbins, Roland <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco command to see active session on "cisco >> WS-C6503-E (R7000)" >> To: "cisco-nsp NSP" <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2012, 8:35 PM >> >> On Dec 13, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Andrew Jones wrote: >> >> > You need netflow enabled on the switch, then enable "ip >> flow ingress" and "ip flow egress" on the interface >> you are interested in, then perform a "show ip cache flow" >> >> In addition to all the caveats which render pre-Sup2T/DFC4 >> NetFlow on 6500 extremely problematic, one ought never under >> any circumstances to enable both ip flow ingress and ip flow >> egress on the same interface. >> >> Instead, use one or the other. But not both. >> > +1 there! (Perhaps beat-up Cisco; ask for a *note* saying "while both are > possible, *doing-both* *is-not-recommended* for reasons *obvious and > not-so-obvious* > ./Randy
So what happens if you enable ip flow ingress & egress on the same interface? Is it a problem with more than the c6500 platform? Thanks, Lee _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
