> However, we also configure the routers with eBGP peers to originate defaults into the IGP, presumably for faster convergence, although given the design I really don't know that convergence will be that much faster.
So than you must also be using the "bgp nexthop route-map" or "nexthop route-policy" in order to control what routes are valid for iBGP next-hops right? Cause if the /32 route for some peer's loopback/iBGP next-hop disappears form ISIS I guess you don't want to follow default route to get to that peer adam _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
