On 28/01/2013 08:53, Gert Doering wrote: > The pure number of VLANs is not the real deciding factor either - having > 1000 VLANs on a single port each is less burden than 100 VLANs, but all > of them on 50 trunk ports. (I could see a router vendor having a limit > there, like "your number of active STP port-vlans must not exceed 100.000" > or such, but "128 vlan limit" is just silly^W product marketing)
there's no 128 vlan limit - it's a spanning tree topology limit of 128 instances for pvrst. If you need more than 128 different topologies in a your network, your network would probably benefit from a redesign. And if you want to use all 4094 vlans on your 3560, there's no problem doing so. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
