Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> writes: > there's no 128 vlan limit - it's a spanning tree topology limit of 128 > instances for pvrst. If you need more than 128 different topologies in a > your network, your network would probably benefit from a redesign. And if > you want to use all 4094 vlans on your 3560, there's no problem doing so.
Does that actually help? Does a 3560 merge multiple VLANs into a single topology if they happen to use the same ports everywhere? When I first hit the 128 VLAN limit on a 3560G I was a bit shocked and decided to go with Q-in-Q to get around it. Then I hit the buffer limits and switched away from Cisco. /Benny _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
