Hi, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:57:25PM +0200, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: > Yes, that's the LAN of the local IX. > > interface TenGigE0/2/0/3.290851 > description ** GRIX ** > ipv4 address x.x.x.x/24 > ipv6 address 2001:648:2100::x/48
This... is amazing. And then people complain that a /64 is too big for
a single LAN.
I'd expect more bugs and unexpected behaviour - implementations get tested
with "LAN = /64", and sometimes with "/112" or "/124", but I'd expect
most interesting results for connected networks with shorter masks.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpsLAwM8vtbq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
