This comes in handy when one jams a bunch of headers together but then
constraints payload size which would result in frag/defrag and may lead
to decreased throughput/performance.
ex: use case I think of would be user facing before encaps into maybe
something like gnarly like gre inside ipsec facing Internet (where MTU
can not be controlled is likely to be assumed =< 1500 ).
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Univ of Minn Alumnus
--
On 02/11/2013 01:56 PM, Eric A Louie wrote:
I just put in this command on my upstream interfaces to help my mpls network
pass traffic - that is, my effort to eliminate fragmentation in my backbone.
Is anyone else using this method of "mtu control"? I need some support - my CEO
is asking why I have to do this, and who else does it, and is it a common
practice, etc, so I'm looking for evidence, more than just "The Cisco TAC told
me to do it".
thanks
Much appreciated, Eric
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
