On 20/02/2013 22:28, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: > If i knew that a single command can decrease throughput from 40G to 8G in a > supposedly top > class cpu with everything hw-accelerated (aka qfp), i would have posted the > nothing > special interface config... and would have looked at other > platforms/solutions...from the > beginning.
to be fair, nbar is kinda different. 40 gbit/sec of nbar classification with no performance hit would be a pretty impressive feat on any platform. > Anyway, previous releases didn't have this issue (at least with this amount > of traffic), > so let's hope it doesn't become a new feature. I don't want to even think > about future > nbar in ASR9k.:-\ does the asr9k even do nbar? I don't think it does even with the ISM module. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
