Mmmmm interesting..... It could be something like this: interface gigabitethernet0/2 > Trunk vs DLSAM/MSAN/FTTH Aggregator switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan none service instance 1 Ethernet > Customer 1 encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dot1q 20 rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric bridge-domain 101 service instance 2 Ethernet > Customer 2 encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dot1q 21 rewrite ingress tag pop 2 symmetric bridge-domain 102
interface vlan 101 description L3 SVI Customer 1 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 interface vlan 102 description L3 SVI Customer 2 ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 But the ME3600X support all features of an MPLS Edge node (MBGP, VPLS, MPLSVPN, QoS etc.) ? I can't found in Cisco documentation how many SVI an ME3600X can support Davide 2013/2/28 Mattias Gyllenvarg <mattias.gyllenv...@bredband2.se>: > Yes and No > > You can do better. > > But you need to learn about EVC and EFP. > > They can basically do whatever you can think of with tags and the attach > that too a "SVI" (evc in nextgeneration gear). > > So, say you want too do a ip unnumbered setup. you just point individual > tags on individial interfaces too a common EVC. Your gonna love it when you > get your head around it. > > > On 28 February 2013 10:41, Davide Ambrosi <davide.ambr...@trivenet.it> > wrote: >> >> Hello Mattias, >> but in the ME3600X (or ME3800X) is it possible to apply a >> configuration like this ? >> >> interface gigabitethernet0/1.10100 >> no switchport >> encapsulation dot1q 10 second-dotq 100 >> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 >> >> >> with the ES+ (and I think also with 7600-SIP-400 + SPA-5X1GE-V2) is >> possible. >> >> Thanks, >> Davide >> >> 2013/2/28 Mattias Gyllenvarg <mattias.gyllenv...@bredband2.se>: >> > Do it in the 3600X, thats what there good at. >> > >> > >> > On 28 February 2013 09:55, Davide Ambrosi <davide.ambr...@trivenet.it> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks Mack, >> >> so I have to change all the 7603 boxes and move to 7603-S to support >> >> the ES+ cards and upgrade all the supervisors to SUP720-3B minimum. >> >> Moving to ASR's series (like the ASR1002) could be a good alternative >> >> choice because of the limited GE ports I need on the small POP's (5 >> >> GE) ? >> >> >> >> Davide >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/2/27 Mack McBride <mack.mcbr...@viawest.com>: >> >> > The ES+ cards are the way to go. >> >> > The OSM modules aren't going to do what you want. >> >> > In addition they aren't properly supported in newer code. >> >> > >> >> > LR Mack McBride >> >> > Network Architect >> >> > >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net >> >> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Davide >> >> > Ambrosi >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:32 AM >> >> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> >> > Subject: [c-nsp] 802.1Q-in-Q VLAN Tag Termination on 7600/6500 OSN >> >> > modules >> >> > >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > We have some 7603 boxes with SUP720/SUP2 installed as main supervisor >> >> > in >> >> > our MPLS Edge sites. >> >> > >> >> > Now we need to terminate QinQ VLAN directly on one or more GE >> >> > interfaces >> >> > of the 7603 routers because we are planning to introduce metro >> >> > ethernet >> >> > tecnologies (ME3400E/ME3600X) in our fiber and microwave access >> >> > network for >> >> > reducing the VLAN configured between the switches located in the >> >> > access >> >> > network (now we have 1 VLAN = 1 Customer). >> >> > >> >> > I see that 7600 catalyst modules doesn't support QinQ VLAN >> >> > termination >> >> > (the command "encapsulation dot1q outer-vlan second-dot1q inner-vlan) >> >> > because they are "LAN" modules. >> >> > >> >> > Is there anyone who tested QinQ termination on old 7600 OSN GE >> >> > modules >> >> > like the OSM-2+4GE-WAN+ ? If not supported the only way to support >> >> > QinQ is >> >> > to buy new (expensive) 7600-S chassis + ES cards or SIP-400 and SPAs >> >> > V2 ? >> >> > >> >> > In out network environment we have also some 7609-S(RSP720) with ES+ >> >> > card located into the core an large aggregation sites and with this >> >> > equipment we don't have problems because the QinQ Termination is >> >> > supported >> >> > on ES+ card. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Davide >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> >> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* >> > >> > *Mattias Gyllenvarg* >> > *Nätutveckling* >> > Bredband2 >> > >> > Tel: +46 406219712 >> > > > > > > -- > *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* > > *Mattias Gyllenvarg* > *Nätutveckling* > Bredband2 > > Tel: +46 406219712 > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/