Thanks everyone who responded. Very helpful. Sorry for the delay in responding back.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Adrian Turcu <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you sure is not just your filtering at the "show route ospf" command, > that leads you to believe there you only send over the 2nd bundle? > From the "show ip route" command it looks like both paths are installed > and you are sending traffic over both paths equally. > > Did you try the following config: > > router ospf 12345 > area XXXX ! <--- your area number where the Bundle-Ether interfaces are > interface Bundle-Ether1 > cost 10 > interface Bundle-Ether2 > cost 20 > > The above will affect all prefixes learned from these paths, i.e. routes > will be preferred via Bundle-Ether1 , while Bundle-Ether2 will be just a > backup path. > > On 4 Apr 2013, at 11:42, Lee Starnes wrote: > > Hello, > > We are trying to change the administrative distance on one of the OSPF > neighbors of our router and no matter what it is set to, the value does not > seem to change. > > #sh ip route x.x.0.102 > Thu Apr 4 02:36:05.122 > > Routing entry for x.x.0.102/32 > Known via "ospf 12345", distance 110, metric 2, type intra area > Installed Apr 4 02:14:55.059 for 00:21:10 > Routing Descriptor Blocks > x.x.25.19, from x.x.0.102, via Bundle-Ether1 > Route metric is 2 > x.x.25.34, from x.x.0.102, via Bundle-Ether2 > Route metric is 2 > No advertising protos. > > #sh route ospf | incl x.x.0.102 > Thu Apr 4 03:31:36.554 > O x.x.0.102/32 [110/2] via x.x.25.34, 01:16:40, Bundle-Ether2 > > > The issue here is that we are trying to avoid sending a majority of our > traffic through Bundle-Ether2 which it seems OSPF has decided is the best > Path. The 0.102 address is a loopback interface of a neighbor (6500b) > directly connected to Bundle-Ether1, where Bundle-Ether2 is connected to > 6500a with less capacity on it's links. This is causing the links on > bundle2 to get saturated at peak times. > > XR-bundle2--->6500a--->6500b > XR-bundle1--->6500b--->6500a > > Configured XR router: > > router ospf 12345 > log adjacency changes > distance 120 x.x.25.34 0.0.0.0 > > Is this a bug or am I going about this all wrong? > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
