Hello.
Same here. Use theese for top of rack and some L2 distribution.
Away with packetdrops. :)
Gustav
Gustav
[email protected] skrev: -----
Till: CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list <[email protected]>
Från: Dan Letkeman
Sänt av: [email protected]
Datum: 2013-02-17 00:51
Kopia: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Ärende: Re: [c-nsp] 2960 -> 4948 - no more drops :)
Från: Dan Letkeman
Sänt av: [email protected]
Datum: 2013-02-17 00:51
Kopia: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Ärende: Re: [c-nsp] 2960 -> 4948 - no more drops :)
Same here. We went from 3560G's to 4948's and it was night and day. Zero
output drops now and a noticeable performance improvement, as we were using
these switches for ISCSI traffic. No qos tuning or disabling helped our
situation on the 3560G's.
What type of traffic were you sending through the 2960G?
Dan.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:15 PM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> We recently upgraded a 2960G(Only doing L2) that was hitting ~500Mb/sec on
> one port, and we were seeing 40,000+ output drops (5Min) - Since the swap
> to the 4948, we see zero output drops. Is the difference in performance
> purely buffer size? I *think* the 2960 has 1.9Mb (Per ASIC) and the 4948
> has 16Mb (total?)?
>
> Cheers.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
output drops now and a noticeable performance improvement, as we were using
these switches for ISCSI traffic. No qos tuning or disabling helped our
situation on the 3560G's.
What type of traffic were you sending through the 2960G?
Dan.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:15 PM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> We recently upgraded a 2960G(Only doing L2) that was hitting ~500Mb/sec on
> one port, and we were seeing 40,000+ output drops (5Min) - Since the swap
> to the 4948, we see zero output drops. Is the difference in performance
> purely buffer size? I *think* the 2960 has 1.9Mb (Per ASIC) and the 4948
> has 16Mb (total?)?
>
> Cheers.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
