The 2960 is a floor/access switch - and at the low end of the range. It isn't positioned or designed to be used in the type of bursty traffic environment that the OP was using it for.

This is a classic example of when a Gig port in name is not a Gig port in throughput, ie it may link up at that speed but you'd be lucky to get the rated throughput in all but ideal circumstances. Unfortunately the concepts around buffers, drops and architecture, and what makes a 2960 different from a 4948 or ME series switch (because they all have 'Gig' ports - but a big price difference) are still concepts foreign to many engineers - more so in enterprise land than service provider land, IMHO.

I doubt it's an attempt at guerrilla marketing. It's no real surprise that once upgrading to a switch that was designed for the purpose that performance and output drops improved significantly.

Reuben

On 17/02/2013 11:25 AM, Alex Pressé wrote:
Not sure if guerrilla marketer trying to get readers to google this
fantastic switch...


On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:14 PM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list <
cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:



Hi Rob (Sorry for not replying inline, but hotmail screws the formatting)

We did try tuning qos buffers (It did improve the drops, but they were
still significant), and we also tried disabling mls qos (Still saw
significant drops)....Im really interested to know why there is such a
difference between the two platforms....i.e. is it buffers/how they are
allocated, architectural differences or combination of both?

Cheers.



Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:27:31 +0100
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960 -> 4948 - no more drops :)
From: robh...@gmail.com
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

We recently upgraded a 2960G(Only doing L2) that was hitting
~500Mb/sec on one port, and we were seeing 40,000+ output drops (5Min) -
Since the swap to the 4948, we see zero output drops. Is the difference in
performance purely buffer size?  I *think* the 2960 has 1.9Mb (Per ASIC)
and the 4948 has 16Mb (total?)?

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to