On Fri, May 3, 2013 14:41, Holger L wrote: > Next we wanted to upgrade our core node links from 10Gbps to 20Gbps using > the unused interfaces on our ES+T-4TG Linecards. > R1===R2 > || || > R4===R3 > > First, I tried to etherchannel them together but faced the problem that > there is no suitable load balancing hash. It can't be balanced by MAC > because in PBB you only see core node macs, which would produce bad load > balancing by 4 different MACs. Neither it can be balanced by MPLS label > because in PBB all ISIDs are transfered in one bridge-domain, thus in one > vfi and results in only one label to reach the next-hop, which produces > very bad load balancing. > > Second, I tried to use RSVP for load balancing and created two primary > MPLS-TE tunnels between every two routers. > R1 Te2/1----[Tunnel R1-R2-1]----Te2/3 R2 > R1 Te2/2----[Tunnel R1-R2-2]----Te2/4 R2 > ... > Now I got two equal routes for each next-hop in the routing tables and > made some tests, well, without success. It seems RSVP load balances by > MPLS label too (correct me if I am wrong) and as already mentioned > PBB-VPLS results in just a few lables and produces bad load balancing.
Anyone has an idea how to do load balancing on two links between PE-Routers in a PBB-VPLS core? Best regards, Holger _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
