Hey Holger EVPN is basiclly in beta and still a pipe dream on any realworld network as far as I can see it.
Completely transparent, we react to nothing the customers sends above ethernet switcing. Any loadbalancing is done in IGP or in a few cases MPLS-TE manipulating IGP. I have a feeling that your failing too separate the layers here. And also perhaps, you may be fixing problems that you dont have yet. We are aware of the semi-unfixable issues of AoMPLS "clouds" and are awaiting EVPN too fix it as there is no real sollution to fix all this. Except IP-VPN :) On 6 May 2013 11:56, Holger L <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mattias, > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 03:13, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: > > From what I gathered about this. > > > > EVPN (BGP signaled Ethernet VPN) will solve this as there are to many > > variants of Spanning tree that your clients can use that you today need > to > > implement individually toward your customers. > > Right, do you know any commands to implement this? All I can find about > this is just sales foo and does not include any commands or examples. > > > We run QinQ in eighter ME3400 or ME3600x CPE and asr9k cores for VPLS > > (H-VPLS) customers. > > Are your lines transparent for customers STP, CDP, PVST+, etc.? Which > technology do you use, L2PT, PBB or something different? > How do you do load balancing in your core network? By Label? > > > Though often not possible we try too get the customer too switch too > > IP-VPN > > as it is much more resilient in nature. More setup Less maintence. > > That's definitely true but most of the time not possible for our customers. > > Thanks and Best regards, > Holger > > -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
