Can you clarify by what you mean by dual-sup? The 5k is single sup only isn't it?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:44 AM, manderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, we currently use a single sup design in one of our DC's and we're > playing w/a dual sup design for single homed servers in our other DC. > Cisco A/S, our SE, and myself are not particularly fond of the dual sup > design. However, the lead engineer appears to be set on going this route. > > Other than having two different architectures at two different DC's, and > designing a network to support single homed servers, I'm looking for > additional pros/cons as points of discussion. > > TIA, > ChiefWFB > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
